|
Kamrowski's last hurrah
An avant-garde legend at Chelsea's River Gallery
It's an anchored iridescent fish with spiky dragon fins. Or
is it a scaly dinosaur in fatigues on a stick? Nearby, an enormous
abstract canvas of burnt ochre and persimmon sizzles with life-affirming
energy. Upon closer inspection, the drip painting reveals a buildup
of sand, rope, and rocks. Pivot again and you're confronted
with a haunting black-and-white constellation of cells and antennae
connected by spectral wavy lines.
Don't panic. You're still in Chelsea, but you've
just entered an alternate artistic universe, one that adroitly
bridges surrealism and abstract expressionism to arrive at a beguiling
visual language all its own.
The gifted creator of this cosmos, Gerome Kamrowski, died at his
home in Ann Arbor this past March at age ninety. Sixty years
earlier, he was one of the most talented painters in the New York
avant-garde, along with William Baziotes, Robert Motherwell, and
Jackson Pollock.
But in 1946 Kamrowski effectively aborted his fast-track career
to accept a teaching job at the U-M. Because of this self-imposed
exile from the center of the modern art world, Kamrowski's work
never gained the wider attention and acclaim it deserved.
Unfortunately, Kamrowski's legacy will soon become less
visible in these parts too. Since his death, Kamrowski's widow
has moved to northern California, where the remainder of his work
now resides. So Chelsea's River Gallery, one of Kamrowski's
longtime Michigan dealers, has thoughtfully organized a sort of
last hurrah a major retrospective spanning the artist's
diverse career. It runs through Sunday, December 5. Outsize
biomorphic paintings, abstract works on paper, multifaceted and
weighty mosaics, and a colorful menagerie of Kamrowski's animal
sculptures are on view in this seminal tribute show at the gallery's
gorgeous new two-story space in downtown Chelsea.
Born in northwestern Minnesota, Kamrowski arrived in New York
in 1938 and became a fixture in the downtown art crowd. It was a
heady time, when artists explored and exchanged new ideas and
techniques. "No one was concerned with turning out an identity
commodity," Kamrowski later recalled.
In 1941, in what is now art-world legend, Baziotes brought some
quick-drying lacquer to Kamrowski's studio, and the two of them
and Pollock dripped it onto several canvases. In one wintry evening,
abstract expressionism was born. In 1990 Kamrowski reminisced,
"We were commanding the scene.
.
.
.
People were paying attention."
But in 1945 his young wife of two years died of cancer. A year
later Kamrowski moved to Ann Arbor, where he would be somewhat
closer to his young son, whom he'd placed with family members
in Minnesota. Kamrowski never publicly admitted regret; indeed,
he often said, "If I'd stayed in New York I'd either
be very rich or I'd be dead" an obvious allusion
to the abbreviated lives of Pollock and Baziotes.
Teaching became a second passion. According to Cecily Donnelly,
a former Kamrowski student at the U-M and cofounder of the River
Gallery, Kamrowski was a gifted and generous mentor. Funny and
irreverent, with a solid build and an orange brush cut, Kamrowski
made an impression, often bringing in discarded remnants from his
own studio. Most of his students had no idea their professor had
been in the vanguard of modern art's New York school.
Over the years, Kamrowski's energy and drive never faltered,
and his style continued to evolve dynamically from the abstract
intellectual exercises of the past to colorful 3-D pieces often
made of glass, cement, and random found objects. He worked every
day and exhibited steadily in Michigan and elsewhere.
Select Kamrowski pieces are represented in such blue-chip
collections as New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art and the
Museum of Modern Art. But living in the Midwest with a healthy
skepticism toward the celebrity art market combined with his
refusal to be categorized never made for a high-profile
career.
According to Kamrowski, that wasn't the point: the freedom
to experiment was. As he said in a 1993 interview, "Fame, and
even money these things don't have much relevance in
art. The goal of art should be an adventure and not merely a tired
mechanical production."
Stephanie Rieke
|